E-LOGOS - University of Economics, Prague
Faculty of Economics, University of Economics, Prague
E-LOGOS
ELECTRONIC JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY - ISSN 1211-0442

Against ‘Racisms’: An Invidious Concept Under Fire (2014)


Author: J. Kerwick

Email: jackk610@verizon.net

Affiliation: Burlington County College, USA

Address:
Burlington County College
Department of Philosophy
601 Pemberton Browns Mill Road
Pemberton, New Jersey 08068


Article type: Standard scientific article

Section: Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy

Language: language


Abstract (english):

In the contemporary Western world, it is impossible to go a single day without hearing about “racism.” Yet beyond thinking of it as something at once ubiquitous and especially, maybe even uniquely, awful, no one seems to know what “racism” is. In this paper, I subject the concept of “racism” to interrogation. I show, first, that in spite of what the singularity of the term may lead us to believe, there is no unitary phenomenon to which “racism” refers. In fact, there are at least four logically distinct and, in some respects, inconsistent conceptions of “racism.” The latter has been defined in terms of: (1) Racial Hatred (RH); (2) Racial Discrimination (RD); (3) Innate Inferiority (II); and (4) Institutional Racism (IR). Secondly, each of these conceptions is problematic on their own terms and, thirdly, none accommodates the popular sense that “racism” is both pervasive and particularly horrible. Finally, I recommend that “racism” is a word that we are better off retiring.



Download/View: kerwick14b.pdf

Current issue

Next issue will be published in August 2017.

Indexed by

E-LOGOS was licensed as peer-reviewed scientific journal by the Research and Development Council of the Government of the Czech Republic.



E-LOGOS is indexed in ERIH Plus.