E-LOGOS - University of Economics, Prague
Faculty of Economics, University of Economics, Prague

Conservatism vs. Neoconservatism: A Philosophical Analysis (2015)

Author: J. Kerwick

Email: jackk610@verizon.net

Affiliation: Burlington County College, USA

Burlington County College
Department of Philosophy
601 Pemberton Browns Mill Road
Pemberton, New Jersey 08068

Article type: Standard scientific article

Section: Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy

Language: language

Abstract (english):

In the world of contemporary American politics, the “conservative movement” continues to figure prominently as a force that is, for all practical purposes, inseparable from the Republican Party. As the 2016 presidential election cycle gets under way, well over a dozen Republican contenders are laboring tirelessly to establish their “conservative” bona fides. In truth, however, neither the “conservative” movement nor most “conservative” politicians are conservative at all. Rather, they are neoconservative, and between neoconservatism and traditional or classical conservatism there is all of the difference, a difference in kind. In this paper, I cite both scholarly and popular representatives of both traditions of thought to show that each depends upon epistemological, ontological, and ethical-political suppositions that are not only fundamentally distinct from, but radically at odds with, those of the other.

Download/View: 22_02_kerwick.pdf

Current issue

Next issue will be published in August 2019.

Indexed by

E-LOGOS was licensed as peer-reviewed scientific journal by the Research and Development Council of the Government of the Czech Republic.

E-LOGOS is indexed in ERIH Plus.