E-LOGOS 2008, 15(1):1-13

Making Polders: Social Communication, Religion, and the Global Environmental Crisis

Arthur Saniotis
Discipline of Anthropology, School of Social Sciences, the University of Adelaide.

Keywords: religion, social communication, macroshift, environment, polders

This paper examines the nexus between social communication, religion and the global environmental crisis and is based on the ideas of the philosopher Ervin Laszlo. I locate social communication and religion in relation to new approaches to tackling global environmental problems. This paper also calls for the need for a macroshift in social communication and religion. This will be based on a shift in worldviews from a logos driven to a holos driven evolution.

Prepublished online: December 22, 2008; Published: June 1, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Saniotis, A. (2008). Making Polders: Social Communication, Religion, and the Global Environmental Crisis. E-LOGOS15(1), 1-13
Download citation

References

  1. Appadurai, A. 1991. "Global Ethnoscapes: Notes and Queries for a Transnational Anthropology." In Richard G. Fox (ed.) Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present.
  2. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press. Pp. 191-210.
  3. Appadurai, A. 1993. "Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy." In The Phantom Public Sphere. Bruce Robbins (ed.) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Pp. 269-95.
  4. Berry, T. 1988. The Dream of Earth. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
  5. Berry, T. 1990. "The Spirituality of the Earth." In Charles Birch, William Eaken and Jay B. McDaniel (eds.) Liberating Life: Contemporary Approaches in Ecological Theology. Maryknoll, New York: Orbis.
  6. Brown, D. A. 2001. "the Ethical Dimensions of Global Environmental Issues," Daedalus Fall: 59-75.
  7. Callicott, J. B. 2001. "Multicultural Environmental Ethics," Daedalus Fall:77-97.
  8. Carrol, J. 2002. Terror: A Meditation on the Meaning of September 11. Melbourne: Scribe Publications.
  9. Diamond, J. 2005. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive. Camberwell, Victoria. Penguin.
  10. Grossman, R. 1999. "Uprooting "Growth" as Metaphor: 20th Century Reflections for the 21st. Blueprint for Social Justice LIII (4&5) December. http://www.ratical.org/corporations/uprootGrowth.html
  11. Guntrip, H. 1969. "Religion in Relation to Personal Interaction," British Journal of Medical Psychology 42: 323-343. Go to original source...
  12. Homans, P. 1970. Theology After Freud. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merril.
  13. James, S. P. 2002. "Heidegger and the Role of the Body in Environmental Virtue," The Trumpeter http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/content/v18.1/james.html
  14. Kakar, S. 1991. The Analyst and the Mystic: Psychoanalytic Relfections on Religion and Mysticism. India: Viking.
  15. Kaplan, A. 1963. "Maturity in Religion," Bulletin of the Philadelphia Association for Psychanalysis 13: 101-119.
  16. Laszlo, E. Macroshift: Navigating the Transformation to a Sustainable World. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
  17. McElroy, M. 2001. " Perspectives on Environmental Change," Daedalus Fall: 31-57.
  18. Messer, E.; Cohen, M. J. 2001. "Conflict and Food Insecurity." 2020 Vision: International Food Policy research Institute, 2020 focus. No. o8-brief 12.
  19. Mombiot, G. 2003. The Age of Consent: A Manifesto for a New World Order. London: Flamingo.
  20. Rupp, G. 2001. "Religion, Modern Secular Culture, and Ecology," Daedalus Fall: 23-30.
  21. Wainwright, H. March 2002. "Globalise the Left." Red Pepper magazine.