E-LOGOS 2015, 22(2):12-18 | DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.419

Cartesian dualism and the study of cultural artefacts

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester, United Kingdom

Keywords: Cartesian dualism, cultural artefacts.

This paper evaluates an argument according to which many anthropologists commit themselves to Cartesian dualism, when they talk about meanings. This kind of dualism, it is argued, makes it impossible for anthropologists to adequately attend to material artefacts. The argument is very original, but it is also vulnerable to a range of objections.

Prepublished online: December 11, 2015; Published: December 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Edward, T.R. (2015). Cartesian dualism and the study of cultural artefacts. E-LOGOS22(2), 12-18. doi: 10.18267/j.e-logos.419
Download citation

References

  1. Evans-Pritchard, E.E. (abridged by E. Gillies). 1976. Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  2. Fodor, J. 1981. The Mind-Body Problem. Scientific American 244 (1): 114-123. Go to original source...
  3. Henare, A., Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S. 2007. Introduction. In A. Henare, M. Holbraad and S.Wastell (eds.), Thinking Through Things. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
  4. Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
  5. Palacek, M. and Risjord, M. 2013. "Relativism and the Ontological Turn within Anthropology." Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43: 3-23. Go to original source...
  6. Sivado, A. 2015. "The Shape of Thing to Come? Reflections on the Ontological Turn in Anthropology." Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45: 83-99. Go to original source...
  7. Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.