E-LOGOS 2018, 25(1):26-32 | DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.452

The asymmetry objection to political liberalism: evaluation of a defence

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester, United Kingdom

Keywords: liberalism, John Rawls, asymmetry objection, Jonathan Quong

This paper evaluates Jonathan Quong's attempt to defend a version of political liberalism from the asymmetry objection. I object that Quong's defence relies on a premise that has not been adequately supported and does not look as if it can be given adequate support.

Published: March 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Edward, T.R. (2018). The asymmetry objection to political liberalism: evaluation of a defence. E-LOGOS25(1), 26-32. doi: 10.18267/j.e-logos.452
Download citation

References

  1. Chan, J. 2000. Legitimacy, Unanimity, and Perfectionism. Philosophy and Public Affairs 29: 5-42. Go to original source...
  2. Hume, D. 1739. A Treatise of Human Nature: Being An Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. London: John Noon. Accessed on 18 th August 2017 from: http://www.davidhume.org/texts/thn.html
  3. Kelsen, H. 1959. On the Basic Norm. California Law Review 47: 107-110. Go to original source...
  4. Quong, J. 2005. Disagreement, asymmetry and liberal legitimacy. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4: 301-330. Go to original source...
  5. Quong, J. 2011. Liberalism Without Perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  6. Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  7. Waldron, J. 1999. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Go to original source...
  8. Williams, B. 1973. The idea of equality. In Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956-1972. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...