E-LOGOS 2023, 30(1):15-36 | DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.498

Fundamental Uncertainty in Model Predictions: Analysis of Modern Macroeconomic Models from the Perspective of Friedman's Instrumentalism

Jáchym Novotný
Faculty of Economics, Prague University of Economics and Business, Czech Republic.

In 1966, M. Friedman published an essay on the methodology of positive economics, in which he emphasized the role of predictions as a decisive criterion for accepting macroeconomic models. This paper analyzes to what extent modern macroeconomics in 2023 is guided by these ideas. The first part of this paper deals with the role of predictions in macroeconomic models and shows that a large part of the models currently used do not contain any predictions at all. The next part of the paper explains the problem of Lucas' critique and the resulting complications in making predictions. The following section shows how modern dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models are attempting to deal with Lucas' criticism. The last part of the text analyzes further fundamental complications in making macroeconomic predictions, such as the issue of free human decision-making, the butterfly effect and the normative form of the questions being studied. The paper shows that a portion of modern macroeconomic models that do not contain predictions would undoubtedly fail Friedman's test, and models created for the purpose of prediction still have not completely dealt with serious methodological complications. Due to the nature of the subject matter, macroeconomic models will likely never be able to provide completely reliable predictions.

Keywords: Methodology, Granger causality, Lucas critique, Forecasting, Butterfly effect

Received: May 2, 2023; Revised: May 2, 2023; Accepted: August 23, 2023; Prepublished online: August 23, 2023; Published: August 31, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Novotný, J. (2023). Fundamental Uncertainty in Model Predictions: Analysis of Modern Macroeconomic Models from the Perspective of Friedman's Instrumentalism. E-LOGOS, 30(1), 15-36. doi: 10.18267/j.e-logos.498
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adam, T. & Michálek, O. & Michl, A. & Slezáková, E. (2021), "The Rushin Index: A Weekly Indicator of Czech Economic Activity", CNB Working Paper Series 4/2021.
    2. Aliyev I. & Bobková B. & Štork Z. (2014). "Extended DSGE Model of the Czech Economy (Hubert3)". Working Paper, No. 1
    3. Ambler S. & Paquet A. (1994)."Stochastic Depreciation and Business Cycle", International Economic Review, 35: 101-116. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527092 Go to original source...
    4. Brázdik F. (2020). "The g3+ Model: An Upgrade of the Czech National Bank's Core Forecasting Framework". Working Papers Series, 7/2020.
    5. Ch. Lawrence J. & M. S. Eichenbaum & M. Trabandt. 2018. "On DSGE Models." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32 (3): 113-40. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.3.113 Go to original source...
    6. Dean, M., (2013). "What Can Neuroeconomics Tell Us About Economics (and Vice Versa)?", in Thomas R. Zentall, and Philip H. Crowley (eds), Comparative Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199856800.003.0018 Go to original source...
    7. Friedman, M. (1966), "The Methodology of Positive Economics". Essays In Positive Economics, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, pp. 3-16, 30-43.
    8. Friedman, M. (1968). "The Role of Monetary Policy". The American Economic Review, 58(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24002-9_11 Go to original source...
    9. Friedman, M. (1977). "Nobel Lecture: Inflation and Unemployment". Journal of Political Economy, 85(3), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.1086/260579. Go to original source...
    10. Gollier, C. (2007). "The consumption-based determinants of the term structure of discount rates". Math Finan Econ 1, 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-007-0004-0 Go to original source...
    11. Goutsmedt, A. & Pinzón-Fuchs, E. & Renault, M. & Sergi, F. (2016). "Criticizing the Lucas Critique: Macroeconometricians' Response to Robert Lucas". CES Working Papers, 2015.59. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2837766 Go to original source...
    12. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). "Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods". Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791 Go to original source...
    13. Hurtado. S. (2014). "DSGE models and the Lucas Critique", Economic Modelling, Volume 44, Supplement 1, Pages S12-S19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.12.002 Go to original source...
    14. Kalman, R.E. (1960), "A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Problems", Journal of Basic Engineering 82, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552 Go to original source...
    15. King, R. G. & Rebelo, S. T. (2000). "Resuscitating Real Business Cycles". National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper Series, 7534. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7534 Go to original source...
    16. Krishnamurthy, V. (2019). "Predictability of Weather and Climate". Earth and Space Science. 6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000586 Go to original source...
    17. Lorenz, E.N. (1963) "Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow". Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2 Go to original source...
    18. Lucas, R. E. (1976). "Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique". Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1:19-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2231(76)80003-6 Go to original source...
    19. Maziarz, M. (2015). "A Review of the Granger-Causality Fallacy", The Journal of Philisohpical Economics: Reflections on Economic and Social Issues. Volume 8, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.46298/jpe.10676 Go to original source...
    20. Pasricha, G. K. (2006). "Kalman Filter and its Economic Applications", MPRA Paper No. 22734.
    21. Praag B. M.S. & Booij A. S. (2003). "Risk Aversion and the Subjective Time Discount Rate: A Joint Approach" CESifo Working Paper Series 923, CESifo. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.396563 Go to original source...
    22. Radder, H. (2009), "The philosophy of scientific experimentation: a review". Automated Experimentation 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1759-4499-1-2 Go to original source...
    23. Rotschedl, J. (2015). "Parametric Discounting Model of Utility". Procedia Economics and Finance 30. 730-741. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01322-2 Go to original source...
    24. Samuelson, P. A. (1964). "Theory and Realism: A Reply". The American Economic Review, 54(5), 736-739.
    25. Sargent, J. T. (1987). "Some of Milton Friedman's Scientific Contributions to Macroeconomics", Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
    26. Schumacher, I. (2006). "On Optimality, Endogenous Discounting and Wealth Accumulation". SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.970312 Go to original source...
    27. Sergi, F. (2018). "DSGE Models and the Lucas Critique. A Historical Appraisal". UWE Bristol, Economics Working Paper Series 1806. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3269916 Go to original source...
    28. Taghizadeh E. & Djafari, A. M. (2022), "SEIR Modeling, Simulation, Parameter Estimation, and Their Application for COVID-19 Epidemic Prediction", Physical Science Forum. https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2022005018 Go to original source...
    29. Wong, S. (1973). "The "F-Twist" and the Methodology of Paul Samuelson". The American Economic Review, 63(3), 312-325. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1914363
    30. Zorzi, M. & Mijakovic, A. & Rubaszek, M. & Cap, A. (2020). "The predictive power of equilibrium exchange rate models". Working Paper Series 2358, European Central Bank. https://doi.org/10.2866/927929 Go to original source...
    31. ECMWF (2023). "Key facts and figures". Link: https://www.ecmwf.int/en/about/media-centre/key-facts-and-figures
    32. Lang, L.& Mareš, J. (2015). " Cyklické očišťování salda vládního sektoru". Informační studie, MF ČR. Link: https://www.mfcr.cz/assets/cs/media/Odborne-vyzkumy_2015-01_Cyklicke-ocistovani-salda-vladniho-sektoru.pdf
    33. Thomson Reuters Eikon. (2023).
    34. Ferreira, P. G. (2014). "The perfect theory : a century of geniuses and the battle over general relativity". Boston : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, ISBN: 9780547554891.
    35. Friedman M. (1955). "The Role of Government in Education". Rutgers University Press.
    36. Friedman, M. &. Snowden P. N. (2002). "Capitalism and Freedom". University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226264211. Go to original source...
    37. Greene, R. B., (1999). "The elegant universe: Superstrings, hidden dimensions, and the quest of the ultimate theory.", ISBN: 9780375708114.
    38. Kratochvíl, Z. (2016). " The Philosophy of Living Nature". Karolinum.ISBN 978-8024631332. Go to original source...
    39. Lorenz, E. N. (1993), "The Essence of Chaos". UCL Press. 227. ISBN 1 85728 187. Go to original source...
    40. Lucas, R. E. & Sargent T. J. (1981). "Rational Expectations and Econometric Pracitce". The University of Minessota Press. ISBN 978-0816609161.
    41. Mandel, M. & Tomšík, V. (2009): "Monetární ekonomie v malé otevřené ekonomice". Praha, Management Press.ISBN 978-8072611850.
    42. Sargent J. T. & Stachurski J. (2022). "Quantitative Economics with Python".
    43. Sokol, J. (1998). "Malá filosofie člověka; Slovník filosofických pojmů". Praha : Vyšehrad. ISBN 80-7021-253-5.
    44. Weinstein, G. (2015). "General Relativity Conflict and Rivalries: Einstein's Polemics with Physicists", (Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing). ISBN 978-1443883627.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content