E-LOGOS 2024, 31(2):19-34 | DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.508

Practical Syllogisms: From Humeanism To Utilitarianism

Yusuke Kaneko
Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan

The practical syllogism of the customary type, “desire, belief /∴ action”, which we may also formulate as “WI (q), BI (p→q) /∴ p”, is the main topic of the following discussions. This syllogism is not valid, viewed at the level of rigid, symbolic logic. That is the initial claim made in this article (§2). Kant may save us from this dead end (§1); but his logic of the imperative is never always provided for our ordinary lives (§3.1). Contrasting the two, Kant’s logic and the customary syllogism, we look into where the invalidity of the latter resides in: individuality of the belief (§1.4), a fallacy of affirming the consequent (§2.1), propositional attitudes (§2.3), irrationality (§3.2), concretely. Although the validity is finally given up, we find another dimension of understanding in the formulation of utilitarianism; this point has been passed over by former thinkers (§4). Before jumping to this conclusion, we look through the landscape of their discussions as well, especially those held under the name of Humeanism. Readers who wonder how this article relates to the main stream of modern debates are recommended to see those parts (§3.3-3.4) first.

Keywords: practical syllogisms; logical validity; causation; utilitarianism; Humeanism.

Received: July 25, 2024; Revised: July 25, 2024; Accepted: December 21, 2024; Published: December 31, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kaneko, Y. (2024). Practical Syllogisms: From Humeanism To Utilitarianism. E-LOGOS, 31(2), 19-34. doi: 10.18267/j.e-logos.508
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alvarez, M. (2016). Reasons for Action: Justification, Motivation, Explanation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    2. Anscombe, G.E.M. (1957). Intention. Harvard U.P.
    3. Anscombe, G.E.M. (1974). Practical Inference. [originally published, as "von Wright on Practical Inference," in Paul Schilpp, ed. The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright (Open Court, 1989), 377-404.]
    4. Anscombe, G.E.M. (2006). Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G.E.M. Anscombe, ed. by M. Geach & L. Gormally. Imprint Academic.
    5. Aristotle. (300BC). Ethica Nicomachea (with an English translation by H. Rackham). Harvard U.P. [References (page numbers) are in accordance with the Prussian/Berlin Academy of Science edition.]
    6. Austin, J. (1832). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Hacket Publishing Company, Inc. [The reference are made by this version published in 1988.]
    7. Beck, L. (1960). A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago U.P.
    8. Bentham, J. (1776). A Fragment on Government. Cambridge U.P. Go to original source...
    9. Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principle of Morals and Legislation, Dover Philosophical Classics. [References are made by the chapter (ch.) and the paragraph (par.)] Go to original source...
    10. Bishago, K. (2016). Internalism and Externalism about Reason[s]. Journal of the Philosophy of Science Society, Vol.49, No.2. [Japanese] Go to original source...
    11. Dancy, J. (2000). Practical Reality. Oxford U.P.
    12. Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, Reasons, and Causes. [The reference is made in accordance with Davidson (2001)] Go to original source...
    13. Davidson, D. (1970a). How is Weakness of the Will Possible? [The reference is made in accordance with Davidson (2001)]
    14. Davidson, D. (1970b). Mental Events. [The reference is made in accordance with Davidson (2001)]
    15. Davidson, D. (1976). Hume's Cognitive Theory of Pride. [The reference is made in accordance with Davidson (2001)] Go to original source...
    16. Davidson, D. (2001). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford U.P. Go to original source...
    17. Finlay, S. et al. (2017). Reasons for Action: Internal vs. External. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    18. Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, Bd. 100.
    19. Goldman, A. (1970). A Theory of Human Action. Princeton U.P.
    20. Harman, G. (1976). Practical Reasoning. The Review of Metaphysics, Vol.29, No.3.
    21. Hempel, C.G. & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science, Vol.15, No.2. Go to original source...
    22. Hume, D. (1739-40). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford at the Clarendon Press. Go to original source...
    23. Iida, T. (1987). An Introduction to Philosophy of Language, Vol. I. Keiso-shobo, Inc. [Japanese]
    24. Yusuke Kaneko (2008). Will, Maxim, and the Moral Law. Tetsugaku-Zassi, Vol. CXXIII. The University of Tokyo. [Japanese]
    25. Yusuke Kaneko (2011). The Normativity of the Mental: Zangwill and a Conservative Standpoint of Philosophy. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 17.
    26. Yusuke Kaneko (2013). Three Utilitarians: Hume, Bentham, and Mill. IAFOR Journal of Ethics, Religion, and Philosophy, 1st issue. Go to original source...
    27. Yusuke Kaneko (2017). Logic of my mind, 2nd ed. Koyo-shobo, Inc. [Japanese]
    28. Yusuke Kaneko (2020). Logic of ethics, Koyo-shobo. Inc. [Japanese]
    29. Yusuke Kaneko (2021). What is the reason for the action for?: a comment on Suzuki's two papers and his review of Logic of my mind, 2nd ed. Journal of the Philosophy of Science Society, Vol.53, No.2. [Japanese] Go to original source...
    30. Yusuke Kaneko (2022). Philosophy of Probability. Morikita Publishing Co., Ltd. [Japanese]
    31. Kant, I. (1785). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Felix Meiner PHB. [The references are made in accordance with 4. Akademie-Ausgabe, with "IV" in front.]
    32. Kant, I. (1787). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. I.KANTS WERKE, Bd. III, hrsg. von E. Cassirer. [The references are made in accordance with 3. Akademie-Ausgabe, with "B" in front.]
    33. Kant, I. (1788). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Felix Meiner PHB. [The references are made in accordance with 5. Akademie-Ausgabe, with "V" in front.]
    34. Kant, I. (1797a). Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre. Felix Meiner PHB. [The references are made in accordance with 6. Akademie-Ausgabe, with "VI" in front.]
    35. Kant, I. (1797b). Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre. Felix Meiner PHB. [The references are made in accordance with 6. Akademie-Ausgabe, with "VI" in front.]
    36. Nobuhara, Y. (1999). Contemporary Philosophy of Mind. Keiso-shobo, Inc. [Japanese]
    37. Paton, H.J. (1947). The Categorical Imperative. Pennsylvania U.P.
    38. Russel, B. (1912). The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford U.P.
    39. Russel, B. (1918). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Routledge. Go to original source...
    40. Satel, S. et al. (2015). Brainwashed : The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience. Basic Books.
    41. Suzuki, Y. (2016a). Defending the Anti-[c]ausal theory of Action Based on the Anti-psychologism of Reason[s]. Journal of the Philosophy of Science Society, Vol.49, No.1. [Japanese] Go to original source...
    42. Suzuki, Y. (2016b). The Renaissance of the Anti-causal Theory of Action. Journal of the Philosophy of Science Society, Japan, Vol.49, No.1. [Japanese]. Go to original source...
    43. Suzuki, Y. (2018). A Book Review: Logic of my mind, 2nd ed. by Yusuke Kaneko. Journal of the Philosophy of Science Society, Japan, Vol.51, No.2. [Japanese]
    44. Von Wright, G. (1972). On So-Called Practical Inference. Acta Sociologica, Vol.15, No.1. Go to original source...
    45. Zangwill, N. (1998). Normative Functionalism and Direction of Fit. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, Vol.91, No.2. Go to original source...
    46. Zangwill, N. (2005). The Normativity of the Mental. Philosophical Explorations, Vol.8, No.1. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content