E-LOGOS 2011, 18(1):1-24 | DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.294

Různé pohledy na otázku: Mohou stroje myslet?

Ondřej Vadinský
University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic

Tato práce se zabývá otázkou, zda mohou stroje myslet. Sleduje tedy proměny její tematizace u~vybraných filosofů a myslitelů, jimiž jsou: Descartův dualizmus, Turingův test, Searlův čínský pokoj, umělé neuronové sítě manželů Churchlandových a Rapaportova abstrakce a implementace a syntaktická sémantika. Poté, co ukáže, jak se tyto tematizace liší a v~čem se naopak shodují, ptá se práce po povaze vztahu mezi myšlením a jeho projevy, který je ústřední pro oprávněnost Turingova testu. Dále práce akcentuje nutnost kombinace vhodné rozlišovací schopnosti s~reprezentativní mírou komplexity pro adekvátnost myšlenkového experimentu s čínským pokojem. Konečně se práce také zabývá vztahy mezi duplikací, abstrakcí a implementací fenoménu myšlení.

Keywords: Umělá inteligence, Turingův test, čínský pokoj, umělé neuronové sítě, abstrakce a implementace, myšlení.

This paper deals with the question, whether machines can think. Changes in thematisation of the question by several philosophers and scientists such as Cartesian dualism, Turing test, Searle's Chinese room argument, artificial neural networks of the Curchlands and Rapaport's abstraction and implementation and syntactic semantics are followed. The paper then shows what are the differences and similarities of such thematisations. Then it asks what is the nature of the relation between thought and its manifestation, which is the cornerstone of the Turing test. Furthermore the paper accents the need of combining suitable distinctive capacities with appropriate complexity to reach adequate analogy in the Chinese room argument. In the end the paper deals with relationship among duplication, abstraction and implementation of thought.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence, Turing test, Chinese room, artificial neural network, abstraction and implementation, thought.

Prepublished online: May 9, 2011; Published: June 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vadinský, O. (2011). Různé pohledy na otázku: Mohou stroje myslet? E-LOGOS, 18(1), 1-24. doi: 10.18267/j.e-logos.294
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. D ESCARTES, R.: Rozprava o metodě. 3. vyd. Praha, Svoboda 1992. 67 str.
    2. T URING, A. M.: Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, str. 433 - 460. 1950. [cit. 2010-04-16]. Dostupný také z WWW: <http://loebner.net/Prizef/TuringArticle.html>. Go to original source...
    3. S EARLE, J. R.: Minds, Brains, and Programs. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, str. 417 - 424. 1980. [cit. 2010-04-16]. Dostupný také z WWW: <http://web.archive.org/web/20071210043312/http://members.aol.com/NeoNoetics/MindsBrainsPrograms.html>. Go to original source...
    4. J ACQUETTE, D.: Adventures in Chinese Room. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 49-4, str. 605 - 623. 1989. [cit. 2010-07-31]. Dostupný také z WWW: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2107850>. Go to original source...
    5. S EARLE, J. R.: Reply to Jacquette. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 49-4, str. 701 - 708. 1989. [cit. 2010-07-31]. Dostupný také z WWW: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2107856>. Go to original source...
    6. C HURCHLAND, P. M. - C HURCHLAND, P. S.: Could a Machine Think? Classical AI is unlikely to yield conscious machines; systems that mimic the brain might. Scientific American, str. 32 - 37. Leden 1990. Go to original source...
    7. R APAPORT, W. J.: Machine Understanding and Data Abstraction in Searle's Chinese Room. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (University of California at Irvine) (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): str 341 - 345. 1985. [cit 2010-08-05]. Dostupný také z WWW: <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/Papers/rapaport85-cogscisoc.pdf>.
    8. R APAPORT, W. J.: Syntactic Semantics: Foundations of Computational Natural-Language Understanding. Aspects of Artificial Intelligence (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers), str. 81 - 131. 1988. [cit. 2010-08-19]. Dostupný také z WWW: <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/Papers/synsem.pdf>. Go to original source...
    9. R APAPORT, W. J.: Understanding Understanding: Syntactic Semantics and Computational Cognition. Philosophical Perspectives, 9, AI, Connectionism and Philosophical Psychology, str. 49 - 88. 1995. [cit. 2010-08-30]. Dostupný také z WWW: <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/Papers/rapaport95-uu.pdf>. Go to original source...
    10. R APAPORT, W. J.: How to Pass a Turing Test: Syntactic Semantics, Natural-Language Understanding, and First-Person Cognition. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 9- 4, AI, Special Issue on Alan Turing and Artificial Intelligence, str. 467 - 490. 2000. [cit. 2010-09-09]. Dostupný také z WWW: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/40180238?origin=JSTOR-pdf>.

    Return to the content